Quality, Expert-Derived Cybersecurity Documentation To Keep Organizations Secure, Compliant & Resilient - No AI Slop!
Secure Controls Framework

Strategy vs Operations vs Tactics

The purpose of this article is to help cybersecurity leaders up their game by gaining a baseline understanding of strategy vs operations vs tactics.

All too often, unprincipled cybersecurity leaders manipulate the business through Fear, Uncertainty and Doubt (FUD) to scare other technology and business leaders into supporting cybersecurity initiatives. These bad actors maintain the illusion of a strong cybersecurity program, when in reality the cybersecurity department is an array of disjointed capabilities that lacks a unifying plan. These individuals stay in the job long enough to claim small victories, implement some cool technology, and then jump ship for larger roles in other organizations to extend their path of disorder. In these cases, a common theme is the lack of viable business planning beyond a shopping list of technologies and headcount targets to further their career goals.

Key Takeaways - Strategy vs Operations vs Tactics
  • Strategy is the why. The organization employs available resources to secure its business goals and objectives (e.g. corporate business plan).
  • Operations is the what. Available resources are used to attain strategic goals within a specific Line of Business (LOB).
  • Tactics is the how. Departments and teams employ techniques and procedures to support operational objectives.
  • These terms originate from military doctrine (US Army FM 100-5, 1982) and have specific meanings that cybersecurity leaders must understand.
  • Tactics support operations, operations support strategy. STRATEGY then OPERATIONS then TACTICS.
  • Cybersecurity is a cost center, not revenue-generating. Business planning is how you justify budget against competing departments.
The Business Case For Planning

Understand Your Audience: Business Planning Terminology Matters

Cybersecurity is a cost center, not a revenue-generating business function. That means cybersecurity competes with all other departments for budget, and it necessitates a compelling business case to justify needed technology and staffing. Business leaders are getting smarter on the topic of cybersecurity, so cybersecurity leadership needs to rise above the FUD mentality and deliver value that is commensurate with the needs of the business.

With compliance such as EU GDPR and NIST 800-171/CMMC, there is a strong need for cybersecurity leaders who can develop and implement strategic plans to protect systems and data in order to keep their company both secure and compliant. The act of implementing cybersecurity strategic plans does not happen overnight since it requires funding for proper staffing and resources. All of this requires a plan.

Having a hierarchical business plan is a logical step to operationalize the business’ requirements. Understanding the hierarchy of business planning documentation can lead to well-informed risk decisions, which influences technology purchases, staffing resources, and management involvement. This is your opportunity to step up by designing and implementing a cohesive cybersecurity strategy that will be an asset to your company and enable you to be the cybersecurity leader that your organization needs you to be.

Would you like to reward exceptional behavior and at the same time hold people accountable for substandard performance?
Business planning goals provide quantifiable targets for both individual contributors and management to objectively gauge performance.
Would you like to know what your priorities are for day-to-day work or initiatives?
Business planning goals prioritize efforts that can help reduce confusion and focus efforts.
If You Fail To Plan, You Plan To Fail

Why Should You Conduct Cybersecurity Business Planning As A CISO?

Some of the most-abused business planning statements are strategy, operations, and tactics. While these terms are used by organizations across the globe, the terms have their origins in military planning where the terms have very unique scopes that are important to understand. Hierarchically, tactics support operations and operations support strategy.

1

Strategic

At the strategic level, an organization employs available resources to secure its business goals & objectives (e.g., corporate business plan).

2

Operational

At the operational level, an organization uses available resources to attain those strategic goals & objectives within a specific Line of Business (LOB).

3

Tactical

At a tactical level, departments/teams employ techniques/procedures to support operational objectives, as defined by the LOB.

The discussion of “strategy vs operations vs tactics” primarily comes down to the concept of defining doctrine. The concepts of strategy, operations and tactics are directly rooted in military planning. The US Army’s formalization of this doctrine occurred in the 1982 release of Field Manual (FM) 100-5 as a way to formalize a logical approach to describe the “levels of war” that span from the generals in charge, all the way to the lowly private in the trenches.

There is overlap between strategic, operational and tactical levels, so there is no clear demarcation that can be uniformly applied to all organizations. The actions of individual contributors at the tactical level stack up to support broader operational goals, which in turn are designed to support a strategy that is aligned with the company’s success. As it applies to the private sector:

In the context of cybersecurity & data privacy considerations, it is possible to overlay the “who, what, when, how & why” across the strategic, operational and tactical needs of your organization:

Real Word Scenario

Real Word Scenario Where Tactics Support Operations & Operations Support The Strategy.

In a real-world scenario, look at the historical event of the Allied invasion of Normandy during the Second World War:

Strategy

The Allies’ high-level plan in Europe was to wage a multi-pronged effort to pressure the Axis powers into an unconditional surrender. This involved the coordination of several heads of state to agree upon a combined goal.

Operations

One of these multi-pronged efforts of the Allied strategy involved opening a new front in western Europe by landing Allied forces in France. Operation Overlord was the effort to invade France via multiple beach landings throughout Normandy in June 1944. This involved the coordination of multiple divisions and military services to deliver the appropriate personnel, equipment, and supplies at the right time and locations.

Tactics

The actions taken by individual soldiers and small units were designed to support the larger effort of Operation Overlord. Each soldier had a role in his unit, and each unit had a role in the beach landings.

The same concept applies to businesses in every industry. The actions of individual contributors at the tactical level stack up to support broader operational goals, which in turn are designed to support a strategy that is aligned with the company’s success.