Quality, Expert-Derived Cybersecurity Documentation To Keep Organizations Secure, Compliant & Resilient  |  Got Questions? +1-307-241-8740
ComplianceForge

Strategy vs Operations vs Tactics

The purpose of this article is to help cybersecurity leaders up their game by gaining a baseline understanding of strategy vs operations vs tactics.

All too often, unprincipled cybersecurity leaders manipulate the business through Fear, Uncertainty and Doubt (FUD) to scare other technology and business leaders into supporting cybersecurity initiatives. These bad actors maintain the illusion of a strong cybersecurity program, when in reality the cybersecurity department is an array of disjointed capabilities that lacks a unifying plan. These individuals stay in the job long enough to claim small victories, implement some cool technology, and then jump ship for larger roles in other organizations to extend their path of disorder. In these cases, a common theme is the lack of viable business planning beyond a shopping list of technologies and headcount targets to further their career goals.

Key Takeaways - Strategy vs Operations vs Tactics
  • Strategy is the why. The organization employs available resources to secure its business goals and objectives (e.g. corporate business plan).
  • Operations is the what. Available resources are used to attain strategic goals within a specific Line of Business (LOB).
  • Tactics is the how. Departments and teams employ techniques and procedures to support operational objectives.
  • These terms originate from military doctrine (US Army FM 100-5, 1982) and have specific meanings that cybersecurity leaders must understand.
  • Tactics support operations, operations support strategy. STRATEGY then OPERATIONS then TACTICS.
  • Cybersecurity is a cost center, not revenue-generating. Business planning is how you justify budget against competing departments.
The Business Case For Planning

Understand Your Audience: Business Planning Terminology Matters

Cybersecurity is a cost center, not a revenue-generating business function. That means cybersecurity competes with all other departments for budget, and it necessitates a compelling business case to justify needed technology and staffing. Business leaders are getting smarter on the topic of cybersecurity, so cybersecurity leadership needs to rise above the FUD mentality and deliver value that is commensurate with the needs of the business.

With compliance such as EU GDPR and NIST 800-171/CMMC, there is a strong need for cybersecurity leaders who can develop and implement strategic plans to protect systems and data in order to keep their company both secure and compliant. The act of implementing cybersecurity strategic plans does not happen overnight since it requires funding for proper staffing and resources. All of this requires a plan.

Having a hierarchical business plan is a logical step to operationalize the business’ requirements. Understanding the hierarchy of business planning documentation can lead to well-informed risk decisions, which influences technology purchases, staffing resources, and management involvement. This is your opportunity to step up by designing and implementing a cohesive cybersecurity strategy that will be an asset to your company and enable you to be the cybersecurity leader that your organization needs you to be.

Would you like to reward exceptional behavior and at the same time hold people accountable for substandard performance?
Business planning goals provide quantifiable targets for both individual contributors and management to objectively gauge performance.
Would you like to know what your priorities are for day-to-day work or initiatives?
Business planning goals prioritize efforts that can help reduce confusion and focus efforts.
If You Fail To Plan, You Plan To Fail

Why Should You Conduct Cybersecurity Business Planning As A CISO?

Some of the most-abused business planning statements are strategy, operations, and tactics. While these terms are used by organizations across the globe, the terms have their origins in military planning where the terms have very unique scopes that are important to understand. Hierarchically, tactics support operations and operations support strategy.

1

Strategic

At the strategic level, an organization employs available resources to secure its business goals & objectives (e.g., corporate business plan).

2

Operational

At the operational level, an organization uses available resources to attain those strategic goals & objectives within a specific Line of Business (LOB).

3

Tactical

At a tactical level, departments/teams employ techniques/procedures to support operational objectives, as defined by the LOB.

The discussion of “strategy vs operations vs tactics” primarily comes down to the concept of defining doctrine. The concepts of strategy, operations and tactics are directly rooted in military planning. The US Army’s formalization of this doctrine occurred in the 1982 release of Field Manual (FM) 100-5 as a way to formalize a logical approach to describe the “levels of war” that span from the generals in charge, all the way to the lowly private in the trenches.

There is overlap between strategic, operational and tactical levels, so there is no clear demarcation that can be uniformly applied to all organizations. The actions of individual contributors at the tactical level stack up to support broader operational goals, which in turn are designed to support a strategy that is aligned with the company’s success. As it applies to the private sector:

Venn Strategic Operational Tactical Flow

In the context of cybersecurity & data privacy considerations, it is possible to overlay the “who, what, when, how & why” across the strategic, operational and tactical needs of your organization:

Venn Tactical Operational Strategic
Real Word Scenario

Real Word Scenario Where Tactics Support Operations & Operations Support The Strategy.

In a real-world scenario, look at the historical event of the Allied invasion of Normandy during the Second World War:

Strategy

The Allies’ high-level plan in Europe was to wage a multi-pronged effort to pressure the Axis powers into an unconditional surrender. This involved the coordination of several heads of state to agree upon a combined goal.

Operations

One of these multi-pronged efforts of the Allied strategy involved opening a new front in western Europe by landing Allied forces in France. Operation Overlord was the effort to invade France via multiple beach landings throughout Normandy in June 1944. This involved the coordination of multiple divisions and military services to deliver the appropriate personnel, equipment, and supplies at the right time and locations.

Tactics

The actions taken by individual soldiers and small units were designed to support the larger effort of Operation Overlord. Each soldier had a role in his unit, and each unit had a role in the beach landings.

Word Crimes Strategy Vs Operations Vs Tactics

The same concept applies to businesses in every industry. The actions of individual contributors at the tactical level stack up to support broader operational goals, which in turn are designed to support a strategy that is aligned with the company’s success.

Common Questions

Frequently-Asked Questions

Here are answers to common questions about strategy, operations, and tactics in cybersecurity:

Who owns strategy, operations and tactics in a cybersecurity program?
The CISO owns cybersecurity strategy and objectives, department heads and team leads own operations, and individual contributors carry out tactics. The CISO's role is to set the big picture of how the department will accomplish its mission. Department heads turn objectives into resourced projects, and staff execute daily tasks through assigned processes and procedures. Poor execution at any level weakens the levels above it.
What is the difference between a mission statement and a vision statement?
A mission statement explains why the business or department exists and what it does, while a vision statement describes where it wants to be. Mission statements are more concrete and action-oriented, and they are directive, issued from higher to lower authority. Vision statements should be concise, unambiguous and inspiring to all staff. If a vision statement has to be explained, it's probably poorly constructed.
Where does the strategy, operations and tactics model come from?
The strategy, operations and tactics hierarchy comes from military doctrine and is generally traced to the US Army's FM 100-5 from 1982. The June 6, 1944 Normandy invasion, codenamed Operation Overlord, shows how the three levels fit together. Allied strategy aimed for the unconditional surrender of the Axis, Overlord was the operation, and individual soldier and small unit actions on the beaches were the tactics.
What makes a good cybersecurity strategy statement?
A good cybersecurity strategy statement describes coherently arranged, high-level actions that achieve the department's mission. It should define an objective with a timeframe, the scope of the business domain it covers, and the advantage that sets the approach apart. Goals derived from it should be SMART, meaning specific, measurable, actionable, realistic and time-bound. Strategy also requires trade-offs, so it should be clear about what the team will not pursue.
How do you turn a cybersecurity strategy into an actionable plan?
Turning strategy into action starts with mapping applicable statutory, regulatory and contractual obligations, then aligning to a leading control framework such as ISO 27002, NIST 800-53 or the NIST Cybersecurity Framework. Next, choose a target maturity level, perform an honest gap assessment from current to target state, and backwards-plan the people, process and technology investments needed. Because cybersecurity is a cost center, that plan becomes the business case for budget.